rant, opine, argue, debate

medium_8985496669

Everyone has an opinion; you’ve heard the cliche linked to this saying and are now snickering right? This will get to the topic of architecture – I promise.

My opinion today, as the year comes to a close, is that I am tired of lazy negativity from people who complain about everyone and everything simply because they can sit back in their over-stuffed La-Z Boy Chair at 2 AM complaining about the world on Facebook and other forms of social media because it doesn’t cater to them.

why doesn't somebody

You might be accusing me of the same crime, but I’m in search of intelligent discourse. Feel free to disagree, but do so in a civil fashion. I’m all for critique, debate and discussion and even differences of opinion. That’s good and it can be healthy.

This is how things move forward. This is how things change for the better.

The solution is NOT in sitting back and being a complainer about everything because some change doesn’t make your personal life better. Maybe a good idea or change will make someone else’s life better, but not specifically yours. Does that grant you privilege to spew mindless, misspelled drivel onto someone else? Selfishness, greed and reluctance to see others thrive does no one any good.

i think they should

It was Churchill who gave us the quote “Never engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed man.” Therefore, in order to discuss the power or architecture around us, we cannot lower ourselves down to the level of every critic. People do not like change and in our built environment, these changes ought to spark debate. People ought to notice what is being built (and destroyed) around them and they must voice their (informed) opinions in a manner that has the power to effect change. We have become complacent in our acceptance of our built environment because we don’t know how to talk about it and we’re too self-centered. People often prefer architecture that is nostalgic and fits their owner personal taste. Therefore, change is not tolerated, yet we only go to places that are new. Inconsistent logic prevails like useless shows on TV.

someone oughta

How do I address this as an architect? I first worry about me. I’m committed to doing my best with every project, every drawing, and every proposed work. Am I the best? I don’t really care. Have I done MY best at that particular time and moment within the abilities and constraints in which I live and work? The answer has to always be yes; I can’t live with anything less. I’m sorry, but I’ve seen and heard too many ill-conceived or lukewarm proposals from architects recently. I’ve also read too much hype and drivel on the internet as well. Who hasn’t seen or read about our cranky Santa Monica architect friend and his first amendment right exercises? That got everyone talking right?

Hopefully tomorrow I’ll post my ongoing questions about architecture that I’ve developed after writing this blog for the past four years. In the meantime, I offer two current but opposing articles that are begging for ongoing discourse about architecture. I have yet to form a solid opinion, but these authors are endeavoring to discuss architecture globally by suggesting the critical issue(s) of what is architecture’s role or more importantly, what is the architect’s role.

I’m not siding with either yet, but they are passionate in their efforts to state their position. Perhaps they are slinging mud from their chairs or perhaps their method is intended to get us thinking. You decide – just think and think deeply.

Are there better examples of contemporary discourse? Take a look on social media and you’ll drown in options for consideration.

However, your voice in your community is more relevant and more powerful. Join in a discussion, but do it well. It just might make a difference. This coming year I have been given opportunity to lend my voice in a public forum and into the ears of someone who can take it to a public forum. Hopefully my words will be generated with the same level of expectation that I have of my work.

photo 1 credit: RebeccaBarray via photopin cc

+ or -

Advertisements
rant, opine, argue, debate

5 thoughts on “rant, opine, argue, debate

  1. I am sick of the values espoused by the American Guild of Partisan Building Stylists, as promulgated (a military term) by their mentally feeble Pundits. And so glad not to be famous, but able to respond to each design challenge given me without resorting much to flavors of the month. I’ll bet my feelings are more common than not among small practitioners. Who are these tarty twits?

    Life is a combination of looking backward and forward, and enjoying all around you that has some conviction and quality. If anyone resonates with what I believe, it would be Stirling. But Architecture is not about belief per se…it is about much more than that. Local and National awards are a cake decorating contest which does our profession not much good. The 25 year awards begin to show what is really valuable.

    1. Well Perry, point taken. I had another group in mind when I wrote this post, but I’ll accept yours too. As always, I am never offended at two people’s different points of view. I take issue with the method and amount of thought put into the way opinions are shared. I take the most offense at inconsistent logic. Don’t complain about not having money for food when you’re spending the money you have irresponsibly somewhere else. It’s that simple.

  2. Chris Lyle says:

    Lee, I think the articles you have posted are the perfect examples of the crisis in the profession. I think my opinions started many years ago in the Betsky camp and have slowly evolved to the “Bingler Conundrum” as I have gained experience running a business and shed the naive egoism taught to me in school. I think architects will be forced to reconcile these opposing views moving forward or we will see architecture become an “area of study” as opposed to a regulated profession. Its already too late for the profession in many respects but the academic debate remains an intriguing curiosity.
    “Do architects really know whats best for themselves let alone the rest of society?”
    Keep up the great work in 2015!!

    1. Chris, great thoughts. I don’t tend to fall into either camp (I hope I made that clear). I’m still thinking about it because good points (and useless points) were made by both sides. I thought Jeremiah’s post today was on point. You can decide. http://roguearch.com/the-last-gasp-of-architectural-critique/

      I am working to gain a voice in my community by just getting the conversation going. I believe lack of education and apathy are components in the public’s lacking, but it’s our profession, so we must lead the way. There’s no money as a motivator, so passion and concern for our own profession is the only motivator.

      1. Seamstressy says:

        Have you seen the British TV shows “Grand Designs” and “George Clarke’s Amazing Spaces”? The first is all about expensive show-off houses, but the second is about small builds on small budgets that would be accessible to almost everyone.

        I think these shows are good for getting the public interested in architecture. It is exciting seeing glimpses of how the people work with their architects.

Please leave a reply, and consider sharing this with a friend.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s